Ever heard the saying, "The Truth is simple"?
All these lawyers and would-be lawyers are on some ego-trip, trying to impress others with their contortions and nonsensical hypotheses.
When you go into Court and there is no Jury, and you want a Jury, you Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court and have a Jury decide if there will be Trial by Jury.
All this cockamania about "contract with the Judge, etc."??? Anyone who gets sucked in by that is to be pitied - because they have lost sight of reality.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: How about that "CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE"?????....Doesn't that say it all?
"CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This e-mail communication is intended for the
sole use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited, unless otherwise authorized
herein. Access to this e-mail by any other person/entity is unauthorized."
Dear Wolter,
These and a load of other issues must be brought to the ultimate authority to make and impose laws, ie: to a JURY.
The criminals and traitors are presently denying us our Right to Trial by Jury...which is why we must (all of us) Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Courts.
This is "CHECKMATE" in our favour......and the criminals and traitors resort of physical assault to gag and imprison us.
That is what is happening in OUR COURTS TO US.
We have the RULE OF LAW on our side..........the criminals and traitors only have the MINDLESS BRUTE FORCE of the Sheriffs.
Our fight is for JUSTICE.
Who will triumph?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From: joosse
To: Maurice Kellett ; Michael Kearns ; Maxwell
Cc: Jack Harper ; jhwilson@acay.com.au ; Sue Maynes ; s.leis@sasktel.net ; skylax@comcast.net ; illusions_@telus.net ; inspectionservice@yahoo.com ; info@pacinlaw.org ; richard@netlaw.co.nz ; Sahaj Mail ; bmcdoug@gmail.com ; dai.buckley@gmail.com ; Dennis
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Were still waiting.Re: Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
With respect Maurice, what you assume is utterly incorrect. We fully understand what world we live in today. However, we were expressing views on what de jure procedure of governing in God's name means, and what makes for de jure authority. Nothing more, nothing less. Believe me when I say that I have far greater understanding of what is happening to us all than the temporal issues that you refer to below.
It was very refreshing, to me at least, to see one post a candid and correct interpretation of what the Crown represents, and the obligations that go with those who represent same. Very few people really understand the natural law. To discover where it is de facto is a relatively easy exercise. However, if you understood the subject as well as you might, then you would realize that those incidents you speak of below are only the result of people who purport to act in the name of the Crown.
Acting on behalf of Elizabeth II can hardly be justified to act in the name of God [the Crown]. Mrs Elizabeth Guelph abdicated together with her purported government the moment that she broke her covenant [coronation oath] with God. You may pick any her of her breaches, and there are plenty to choose from I suggest. Besides she never enjoyed a natural birthright to the Crown and in reality is only an impostor. The rightful King of the UK would be Michael Hastings who resides in Inverell in NSW, Australia. So please do not mix up de facto authority with de jure authority.
And with respect, you only could go on with what the present de facto Regina might represent and others who follow or represent a false crown. But that is another debate altogether. Anyone who purports to be an officer of the Crown has a duty of care to uphold the temporal Sovereign's covenant with God and His Laws. Failing to do so is an act of treason, since it means the demise of the temporal Sovereign as she abdicates in law.
kind regards
Wolter
----- Original Message -----
From: Maurice Kellett
To: Michael Kearns ; Maxwell
Cc: Jack Harper ; jhwilson@acay.com.au ; joosse@internode.on.net ; Sue Maynes ; s.leis@sasktel.net ; skylax@comcast.net ; illusions_@telus.net ; inspectionservice@yahoo.com ; info@pacinlaw.org ; richard@netlaw.co.nz ; Sahaj Mail ; bmcdoug@gmail.com ; dai.buckley@gmail.com ; Dennis
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Were still waiting.Re: Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
My reply to this posting is likely to be long so I will make it as short as possible.
It does appear that you are living in an unreal world with delusions about what the UK Monarchy is and is not.The Judicial Oath of fairness sworn by all UK judges and magistrates is a massive fraud and the Crown is an integral part of this fraud. Fairness under the Judicial Oath is not a common feature of the UK justice system. Corrupt judges etc, such as former recorder John Hugh Fryer-Spedding, reputed to be a friend of Queen Elizabeth II, shelter from their crimes under the Crown. Queen Elizabeth II is nothing to do with God insofar as she is being protected by the Royal Prerogative not God.
Criminals favoured by the UK Monarch are being given Crown immunity from prosecution and this may well also be unlawful and in any event and is certainly more Crown injustice.
It is alleged that the Royal Prerogative has been passed down throughout the ages under Common Law. The UK Crown has its own laws it would seem and has never relied on the Common Law. If the Crown alleges that the Royal Prerogative preventing them from prosecution, which the corrupt UK establishment is doing, then the Magna Carta and the right to trial by jury has also been passed down throughout the ages since long before the Royal Progative was allegedly handed down. The principles of law under the Magna Carta have been eroded by the many corrupt judges now in seats of power in the UK. Their inherent corruption is being protected by the Crown. I have first hand knowledge of this fact so I do speak from experience. Even a summary examination will show that a Monarchy has very often had nothing to do with justice for the people. A Monarchy makes its own laws and rules according to what suits them at the time. We have seen this situation quite recently in the matter of Charles and Camilla. Up until quite recent times, a divorcee was not allowed to marry into the Royal Family. For Charlie boy this has all changed.
Several years ago I wrote to Queen Elizabeth II on the matter of the theft of my home, land, and most of my personal possessions resulting from crime carried out against me by recorder John Hugh Fryer-Spedding of Bassentwaite, Kewick, Cumbria I have made two demands to the Chief Constable of Cumbria, for the arrest of Spedding. These demands continue to be ignored.
I also included the fact in my letter to the UK Crown that Northumbria Police Special Squad officers had taken part in the theft of my home and had also made two attempts on my life first by shooting me and by trying to push a sword into my chest in February 2003 at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne and Wear. I am now quite sure why police had attempted to murder me. Yes I do believe that there is a God but I don't think that the UK Crown has that belief. Of course I did not receive an acknowledgement from those at Buckingham Palace to my letter. For them to have done that would have also meant acknowledgement that Crown officers, i.e. the police do carry out murder in the name of the Crown. We have seen a similar situation recently with the police murder of Charles de Menzies. There are in fact more such murders.
I could go on with the argument against what the Crown is not, but doing that with someone who thinks that the Crown can do no wrong and that the sun shines out of her rear is clearly living on another world where fairies live. I worked very hard for what was stolen from me. That followed my having contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the UK police and judiciary in 1996. That alleged Inquiry was carried out with Crown permission. The UK Crown is the Patron of the Secret Society of Freemasonry so it was not and could never have been an independent or impartial Inquiry. Lord Nolan who chaired that alleged Inquiry died on 22nd February this year. He was surely well aware of these facts the same as myself. I kept in personal contact with Lord Nolan for several years after the alleged Inquiry into Freemasonry within the police and judiciary. These people operate under the Crown authority and any adverse outcome of such Inquiry would only have reflected back to the Crown. History proves this would never be allowed by the Crown.
Maurice Kellett.
----- Original Message -----
From: Maxwell
To: Maurice Kellett ; Michael Kearns
Cc: Jack Harper ; jhwilson@acay.com.au ; joosse@internode.on.net ; Sue Maynes ; s.leis@sasktel.net ; skylax@comcast.net ; illusions_@telus.net ; inspectionservice@yahoo.com ; info@pacinlaw.org ; richard@netlaw.co.nz ; Sahaj Mail ; bmcdoug@gmail.com ; dai.buckley@gmail.com ; Dennis
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:10 PM
Subject: Were still waiting.Re: Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
All Christian's have "real" Royal Prerogative exemption in all matters and choose the Royal Law over the Laws of men.
People forget what's really hidden behind the CROWN.
1. The Queen is a "Regina" not a Queen she is "R" a female Regent. BIG DIFFERENCE.
THIS IS WHY "CROWN" CASES ARE NOTED ----- "R" v Smith. (Regina v Smith)
2. The King took none to Court and defended those being punished. He pre-released all those with faith and works from all sin.
Sin no more. A Court is a Christian Royal house, A tribunal is a Roman Pagan Temple.
3. A Regent only rules in the "absence" of the King.
4. The "Supreme" Head of the Church of England is not the Queen.
5. The "Supreme" Head of the Church of England is Jesus Christ as "Publicly" acknowledged by the Church. Christ means King.
6. The Royal King of Kings can never be replaced nor die as he was raised from his death (he died "King of the Jews") and was given "all" Authority in Heaven and on Earth as King of Kings Lord of Lords, he lives forever therefore any "other" future King or Queen etc will be imposter.
Thy (your) Kingdom come "on Earth" as it is in Heaven (already)
7. All Christian's have Royal Prerogative exemption in all matters and choose the Royal Law over the Laws of men.
As all Christians are the "adopted" ( legal children ) of the King as per the Royal Law, Last Testament and Will.
If the King predated their forgiveness of ALL sin what man or woman would dare charge them.
What common servant would dare charge a Kings child let alone the very King of Kings children.
Forgive us our debts (sins errors debts) as we forgive our Debtors.
8. The Crown and ALL authority belongs to the King, he has an Estate that is administered by common Servants our his Servants.
9. The Crown, the Titles, the Treasury the Estate has been abused stolen and hidden from his adopted children.
10 A will and testament has existed for hundreds of years in the common language of his children, it describes his estate, his Kingdom, the inheritance, heirs and inheritors, the wicked servants, the wicked Judges, (Judge Not lest you be Judged), Woes of Bloodguilt weigh on the Lawyers & Religious Heads (Scribes and Pharisees).
If probated, the very will of the King would share the Crown Estate equally among the Kings children. This is why it the WILL is hidden concealed abused for they have stolen the LOT.
11. The Church of England is untaxed and owns each title of Land in the "Commonwealth" is in her Religious Subdivision as a Registered "Parish"
12. The Landowners have NO real estate ownership they are registered TENANT's, either as Tenants in Common or Joint Tenants.
13. The creation of non existent Corpses that are fictional dead persons invented as dead Corp orations masks the hidden owners of everything real and shield them "the servants" from prosecution & examination. This corruption has resulted in everything including Churches Political Parties Nations Governments Public Utilities Banks Credits Debts Assets even our Water of all life of the people being wholesaled and stolen without examination charge or mass complaint.
14. If any Regent were King or Regina were Queen the Jubilee itself released all from slavery debts every 7 years and every 50th year was a Grand Jubilee 7 x 7 + 1 = 50.
He was annointed by his Father at his Baptism in year 30 ..... He died in 33 ..........1974 years later .....39.5 Royal Jubilees later......Were still waiting for the Jubilee.
Thanks
Mike Maxwell
Without Prejudice
All Rights Rites Writes and Riots Reserved
Without Recourse
Version dated 22nd November 2007
=================================================================================================
At 12:30 AM 20/11/2007 -0800, Maurice Kellett wrote:
Dear Michael,
I will reply to your e-mail hopefully more fully sometime latere today. I have urgent work that needs attention today. you have written:
"Fairness is one of the cornerstones of any justice system. THAT IS CORRECT, BUT YOU ARE NOT IN A JUSTIC SYSTEM, NO MATTER WHAT THE GOVERNMENT SAYS, YOU ARE IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM. THE ONLY QUESTION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IS, THE ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY CORRECT AND REASONABLE?" AND THE PRESUMPTION IS, YES IT IS"
One question which comes to my mind is who says that such a PRESUMPTION is reasonable and what are their qualifications for giving this opinion. The fact that the Judicial Oath (of Fairness) sworn by judges and magistrates to the Crown has no meaning except probably as a means to deceive the public and is therefore deception of a criminal nature. This fact dictates that the UK Crown is a criminal regardless of whether she is being protected by alleged Crown Immunity from prosecution. A criminal is a criminal whether that crime is protected or not. Cases where Crown Immunity is relied on as a defence should also be brought to trial to allow the pubic to see for themselves just how the alleged justice system works and protects crime carried out by those favoured by the Crown.
It is alleged that the Royal Prerogative has it is claimed has been passed down through the ages which is protecting the UK Crown from prosecution. Similarly Trial by Jury has also been passed down through the ages but is being eroded by what is generally a corrupt judiciary.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Kearns
To: Maurice Kellett
Cc: Jack Harper ; jhwilson@acay.com.au ; Maxwell ; joosse@internode.on.net ; Sue Maynes ; s.leis@sasktel.net ; skylax@comcast.net ; illusions_@telus.net ; inspectionservice@yahoo.com ; info@pacinlaw.org ; richard@netlaw.co.nz ; Sahaj Mail ; bmcdoug@gmail.com ; dai.buckley@gmail.com ; Dennis
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
Maurice: My comments are in BOLD CAPS.
On Nov 19, 2007 6:00 PM, Maurice Kellett
The other title for lawyers is Officers of the Courts. They are therefore a part of them, corruption and all. All UK courts operate under the authority of the UK Crown the same woman who is an integral part in the massive Judicial Oath fraud. UK Members of Parliament are required to swear an Oath of Allegiance only to the UK Crown but not to the people who have voted them into office and are then required to page their wages. I am satisfied after have spent considerable time communicating to UK Members of Parliament, that only the UK Crown has such Members of Parliament. The UK public it would seem are being deceived that they have such Members of Parliament. No, I think that we must expose the UK Crown for the wrongs that it is causing to the UK public and it would also seem in other countries before public opinion will help bring about an end to judicial crime. The Judicial Oath sworn by all UK judges and magistrates only to the UK Crown is a fraud and therefore a crime. Should we really accept a criminal as our Head of State and the Head of State in Commonwealth countries?
Fairness is one of the cornerstones of any justice system. THAT IS CORRECT, BUT YOU ARE NOT IN A JUSTIC SYSTEM, NO MATTER WHAT THE GOVERNMENT SAYS, YOU ARE IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM. THE ONLY QUESTION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IS, "IS THE ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY CORRECT AND REASONABLE?" AND THE PRESUMPTION IS, YES IT IS. The UK Judicial Oath of Fairness sworn only to the Queen most certainly does not have the meaning that its supposed to have. This amounts to a criminal deception. I have suffered a Hell caused by very considerable judicial crime. Then find that the judicial mob are being given Crown Immunity to protect them from their crimes. No, the UK Crown has a lot to answer for. Monarchy's have generally been involved in crimes against the people for centuries. Nothing has changed in this respect. REMEMBER NOW, DON'T BE TOO TOUGH ON THE OLD QUEEN, BECAUSE SHE OPERATES UNDER THE PRESUMPTION, YOU VOLUNTEERED. HOW DOES SHE DO THAT, BECAUSE YOU NEVER TOLD HER DIFFERENT IN THE CORRECT MANNER.
Judges must be made accountable for their crimes or there is no justice. Obtaining justice is one of the most expensive items a person might have to resort to in their lifetime. Justice is surely a basic right of all mankind but with criminals in the driving seat, what else should we expect? The English Civil wars came about because of much the same situation that has come about again. The world does indeed have terrorists and they are often home grown as well. There should be a notice placed above the doors of all UK courtrooms, "Abandon Hope All Who Enter Here". NO, THE SIGN SHOULD READ, "ADMINISTRATIVE COURT, ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK." Truth must prevail from entering and leaving any courtroom. COME ON GUYS, TRUTH IS NOT EVEN A CONSIDERATION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ROOM, GIVE ME A BREAK.
Maurice Kellett
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Harper
To: jhwilson@acay.com.au
Cc: 'Michael Kearns' ; 'Maxwell' ; joosse@internode.on.net ; 'Sue Maynes' ; s.leis@sasktel.net ; skylax@comcast.net ; illusions_@telus.net ; inspectionservice@yahoo.com ; info@pacinlaw.org ; richard@netlaw.co.nz ; 'Sahaj Mail' ; bmcdoug@gmail.com ; dai.buckley@gmail.com ; m.kellett@tiscali.co.uk ; 'Dennis'
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
Forget about chasing the Queen, politicians, judges etc.
Go for the throat of the instigators of the whole screwed up system.
Go for the LAWYER'S and their "word law."
Excerpt from;
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
by Fred Rodell 1939
Professor of Law, Yale University
"The Law is the killy-loo bird of the sciences. The killy-loo, of course, was the bird that insisted on flying backward because it didn't care where it was going but was mightily interested in where it had been. And certainly The Law, when it moves at all, does so by flapping clumsily and uncertainly along, with its eye unswervingly glued on what lies behind. In medicine, in mathematics, in sociology, in psychology – in every other one of the physical and social sciences – the accepted aim is to look ahead and then move ahead to new truths, new techniques, new usefulness. Only The Law, inexorably devoted to all its most ancient principles and precedents, makes a vice of innovation and a virtue of hoariness. Only The Law resists and resents the notion that it should ever change its antiquated ways to meet the challenge of a changing world.
It is well-nigh impossible to understand how The Law works without fully appreciating the truth of this fact: — The Law never admits to itself that there can be anything actually new under the sun. Minor variations of old facts, old machines, old relationships, yes; but never anything different enough to bother The Law into treating it otherwise than as an old friend in a new suit of clothes. When corporations first came on the legal scene, The Law regarded them as individual persons, in disguise, and so, for most legal purposes, a corporation is still considered, and even talked about, as a "person." A transport airplane, so far as The Law is concerned, is nothing but a newfangled variety of stagecoach. Such things as sit-down strikes, holding companies, Paris divorces, were treated with almost contemptuous familiarity by The Law when they first appeared, and the same fate undoubtedly awaits television when it grows up and begins to tangle with The Law. For all this is part of a carefully nurtured legend to the effect that The Law is so omniscient that nothing men may do can ever take it unawares, and so all-embracing that the principles which will apply to men's actions 500 years from now are merely waiting to be applied to whatever men happen to be doing in 2439 A.D."
Offered for your consideration,
Jack
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1139 - Release Date: 19/11/2007 12:35
--
Have a great day.
Michael Joseph Kearns
michael.joseph.kearns (at) gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1139 - Release Date: 19/11/2007 12:35
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.1/1140 - Release Date: 19/11/2007 7:05 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date: 21/11/2007 10:01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date: 21/11/2007 10:01 AM
__________ NOD32 2679 (20071122) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
No comments:
Post a Comment